Current:Home > reviewsJudge denies Apple’s attempt to dismiss a class-action lawsuit over AirTag stalking -StockPrime
Judge denies Apple’s attempt to dismiss a class-action lawsuit over AirTag stalking
View
Date:2025-04-19 08:37:03
NEW YORK (AP) — A judge has denied Apple’s motion to dismiss a class-action lawsuit claiming that stalkers are using its AirTag devices to track victims — and that the tech giant hasn’t done enough to prevent them.
Apple’s $29 AirTags have become popular items since their 2021 release, helping users keep tabs on the location of anything from their lost keys to wallets and luggage. But stalkers have also taken advantage of AirTags and similar products to follow individuals without their consent.
In December 2022, Apple was sued by dozens of plaintiffs who said they were stalked by AirTag users. They alleged that Apple failed to mitigate such dangers and should have done more to protect victims — claiming AirTags “revolutionized the scope, breadth, and ease of location-based stalking” and that current safety features are inadequate.
Apple attempted to dismiss the litigation in a filing last year, arguing the company “took proactive steps to try to deter misuse” and that it should not bear liability for injuries caused by third parties. But San Francisco-based U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria dismissed that motion on Friday.
Chhabria ruled that, while most of the class-action plaintiffs’ claims were “inadequately pled,” three can proceed for negligence and strict product liability under California law. The remaining claims were dismissed in a separate order.
“Apple may ultimately be right that California law did not require it to do more to diminish the ability of stalkers to use AirTags effectively, but that determination cannot be made at this early stage,” Chhabria wrote.
Chhabria detailed arguments from both Apple and the plaintiffs in the ruling. Included were accounts from the three remaining claims of victims being stalked by former partners or others through AirTags that were allegedly attached to their cars, resulting in emotional and sometimes financial harm.
All three of these cases involve “purported defects” of AirTags that made it harder for the victims to both understand the tracking and quickly stop it, Friday’s ruling outlines, including unclear or delayed notifications, as well as an inability to disable the devices remotely, which allegedly prolonged stalking.
“We’re grateful for the opportunity to continue this critical litigation,” Gillian L. Wade, an attorney representing the plaintiffs, told The Associated Press via email. “Abusive and dangerous location tracking is only becoming more common, so it’s imperative to do everything we can to give voice to the victims, and to push for accountability and change.”
Apple and attorneys representing the California-based company did not immediately respond to requests for comment Tuesday.
Back in February 2022, months ahead of the class action filing, Apple released a statement that said it “condemn(s) in the strongest possible terms any malicious use of our products.” It also noted then-planned updates aimed at increasing safety.
Last year, Apple also partnered with Google to submit a proposal aimed at setting standards for combatting secret surveillance on AirTags and similar gadgets.
veryGood! (495)
Related
- Cincinnati Bengals quarterback Joe Burrow owns a $3 million Batmobile Tumbler
- Appeals court halts order barring Biden administration communications with social media companies
- As the Climate Changes, Climate Fiction Is Changing With It
- Why Kristin Davis Really Can't Relate to Charlotte York
- Trump wants to turn the clock on daylight saving time
- Why It’s Time to Officially Get Over Your EV Range Anxiety
- Environmentalists Praise the EPA’s Move to Restrict ‘Forever Chemicals’ in Water and Wonder, What’s Next?
- Elon Musk launches new AI company, called xAI, with Google and OpenAI researchers
- San Francisco names street for Associated Press photographer who captured the iconic Iwo Jima photo
- In Pennsylvania, Home to the Nation’s First Oil Well, Environmental Activists Stage a ‘People’s Filibuster’ at the Bustling State Capitol
Ranking
- Meta donates $1 million to Trump’s inauguration fund
- Richard Simmons’ Rep Shares Rare Update About Fitness Guru on His 75th Birthday
- In the Race to Develop the Best Solar Power Materials, What If the Key Ingredient Is Effort?
- What Is Permitting Reform? Here’s a Primer on the Drive to Fast Track Energy Projects—Both Clean and Fossil Fuel
- A White House order claims to end 'censorship.' What does that mean?
- Gov. Moore Commits Funding for 67 Hires in Maryland’s Embattled Environment Department, Hoping to Fix Wastewater Treatment Woes
- Get 4 Pairs of Sweat-Wicking Leggings With 14,100+ 5-Star Amazon Reviews for $39 During Prime Day 2023
- Get a 16-Piece Cookware Set With 43,600+ 5-Star Reviews for Just $84 on Prime Day 2023
Recommendation
The city of Chicago is ordered to pay nearly $80M for a police chase that killed a 10
Tesla board members to return $735 million amid lawsuit they overpaid themselves
Pittsburgh Selects Sustainable Startups Among a New Crop of Innovative Businesses
Annoyed With Your Internet Connection? This Top-Rated Wi-Fi Extender Is on Sale for $18 on Prime Day 2023
Highlights from Trump’s interview with Time magazine
Why It’s Time to Officially Get Over Your EV Range Anxiety
Study Documents a Halt to Deforestation in Brazil’s Atlantic Forest After Indigenous Communities Gain Title to Their Territories
Outdated EPA Standards Allow Oil Refineries to Pollute Waterways